Airplane seatback pocket a no-stow zone
On The Spot by Los Angeles Times Travel editor Catharine Hamm
Question: I was on a Southwest flight recently, and the flight attendant said that folks could not put their laptops in the seatback pocket. Why not?
– Elizabeth Barnes, Sparks, Nev.
Answer: Consider the glove box in your car. It was designed to hold the operating manual and maybe the occasional work order for maintenance or repair. It wasn’t designed to hold an accordion file of grocery story coupons and recipes, two tire gauges (in case one breaks, you know), a bottle of Excedrin, a “break the window if you’re drowning” hammer, hand lotion, 65,000 napkins and a copy of “The Time Traveler’s Wife.”
One day, that little compartment in my car is going to shout, in whatever language plastic uses, “I can’t take it anymore!” And then it will explode like a rocket on the Fourth of July.
Likewise, a Southwest seatback pocket is designed to hold safety information, a magazine or two and an airsick bag — in total, about 3 pounds of stuff. Unless you’re using one of the lightweight netbooks that we wrote about in last Sunday’s Travel section (latimes.com/netbooks), that seatback pocket isn’t strong enough for a laptop computer.
But it’s also not safe enough, no matter what you’re computing with, and that may be the bigger issue. A seatback pocket is not an approved storage space.
In the end, storage is really all about safety, which is what flight attendants are charged with.
Federal Aviation Administration regulations dealing with what we can put where “essentially say that each article of carry-on baggage must be stowed under a seat or in a compartment that’s placarded for its maximum weight and able to provide proper restraint for anything that’s stored inside it,” said Ian Gregor, a spokesman for the FAA.
The seatback pocket isn’t one of those places.
And a seatback pocket also isn’t a trash receptacle, so if you have litter, give it to the flight attendant. Putting your used tissues, candy wrappers and packets of mayo in there slows the cabin cleaning process.
That’s important on quick turnarounds, especially for Southwest, where the average ground time is 25 minutes. That may sound like a luxury of time, but in just shy of half an hour, passengers disembark, the cabin and lavatories are cleaned, the seatbelts are arranged back on the seats, the plane gets its provisions and the new passengers get on and find a seat, said Marilee McInnis, Southwest spokesperson.
Leaving your discards behind is, well, a bunch of rubbish.
Have a travel dilemma? Write to travel@latimes.com
[Graphic: Mark Shaver / For The Times]
5 Comments on “Airplane seatback pocket a no-stow zone”
Leave a Comment
If you are under 13 years of age you may read this blog, but you may not participate. Here's the full legal spiel.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear on this blog until the author has approved them.
All fields are required
Advertisement
SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG
Click the logo below to subscribe to news from this blog:
Or add this feed to your favorite RSS reader:
more
Or add this feed to your favorite RSS reader:
more
Advertisement
May 19th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
One other reason is if the plane has a sudden drop in altitude your laptop could jump out of the pouch and land on your foot, hit you (or someone else) in the face if it were sudden enough, or hit the deck and break.
In the case of a crash it could become a lethal projectile.
On the floor it might slide around and possibly hit someone’s foot in a crash scenario but it would be unlikely to be lethal.
This is why all luggage is either under a seat (where it is less likely to move around) or in the overhead compartments (where it is contained).
May 20th, 2009 at 1:02 pm
Don’t forget the fact that someone’s back is on the other side of that pocket. I’ve had people put very uncomfortable water bottles and such in the pocket behind me. Not nice.
May 20th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
Hmm… I’ve always considered that glove boxes were designed to hold gloves.
May 21st, 2009 at 11:50 am
This all makes sense. What doesn’t make sense is why I am any safer if my seatback is in the upright position vs. leaned back 2 inches.
Also, why is it okay for airlines to use a plane for more than 15 years? I just took an international flight and all the movies were operated by a VCR. That made me feel safe. I kept trying to imagine how outdated the cockpit technology was.
May 21st, 2009 at 12:28 pm
Twenty-five minutes — that’s an eternity. When I was flying for Southwest, we used to deplane 128 passengers, clean the cabin, reprovision, refuel, empty the lavs, arrange the seat belts and embark another 128 passengers in just TEN MINUTES. It was the marvel of the airline industry and the reason Southwest made money. If we had twenty-five minutes, we could have washed and waxed the entire airplane and steam cleaned the carpets and seat cushions. “Airplanes don’t make money sitting on the ground.”